Dave speaks out in the recent protests in Egypt. This was originally intended as a reply to a News Reel on YouTube from the Aus Network. The original video that Dave was replying to may be viewed below.
Showing posts with label fascism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label fascism. Show all posts
Friday, January 28, 2011
Saturday, May 22, 2010
HUMAN RIGHTS UNDER ATTACK IN THAILAND
These are disturbing images coming out of Thailand. The government and military are killing protestors who dare to speak out against its dictatorial leadership.
Labels:
civil rights,
dictatoship,
fascism,
fascist,
freedom,
human rights,
humanitarian,
killing,
martial law,
military,
military rule,
oppression,
oppressors,
police state,
thailand
Friday, May 21, 2010
JOHN F. KENNEDY ON SECURITY VERSUS FREEDOM
Tuesday, March 2, 2010
Chicago's Gun Ban to Go Before Supreme Court
The right to bear arms will undergo a trial by the Supreme Court, beginning today.
The Second Amendment to the United States Constitution is that part of the Bill of Rights which protects the individual right to keep and bear arms. According to the American Bar Association, there has been more disagreement on how to interpret the Second Amendment than any other part of the Constitution. Because there are supporters and detractors of the right to bear arms on both the right and the left, this battle will not be decided today. Other cases where the Supreme Court has sought to interpret the Second Amendment include: United States v. Cruikshank (1875), Presser v. Illinois (1886), Miller v. Texas (1894), Robertson v. Baldwin (1897), United States v. Miller (1939), and District of Columbia v. Heller (2008).
Personally, I don't want cops and criminals to be the only people with guns. I believe the intent of the framers of the Second Amendment was to prevent the Government from oppressing the American people through force and give the people a means to protect themselves against unreasonable government intrusion into their personal freedoms.
In light of the Supreme Court's recent decision to remove limits on Corporate political campaign contributions (effectively putting the US Government into the hands of private industry), I suspect the Court will betray the American people again and enforce the proposed weapons ban.
Here is a link to ABC's article on the subject: http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/supreme-court-hears-chicago-gun-ban-case/story?id=9780703
The Second Amendment to the United States Constitution is that part of the Bill of Rights which protects the individual right to keep and bear arms. According to the American Bar Association, there has been more disagreement on how to interpret the Second Amendment than any other part of the Constitution. Because there are supporters and detractors of the right to bear arms on both the right and the left, this battle will not be decided today. Other cases where the Supreme Court has sought to interpret the Second Amendment include: United States v. Cruikshank (1875), Presser v. Illinois (1886), Miller v. Texas (1894), Robertson v. Baldwin (1897), United States v. Miller (1939), and District of Columbia v. Heller (2008).
Personally, I don't want cops and criminals to be the only people with guns. I believe the intent of the framers of the Second Amendment was to prevent the Government from oppressing the American people through force and give the people a means to protect themselves against unreasonable government intrusion into their personal freedoms.
In light of the Supreme Court's recent decision to remove limits on Corporate political campaign contributions (effectively putting the US Government into the hands of private industry), I suspect the Court will betray the American people again and enforce the proposed weapons ban.
Here is a link to ABC's article on the subject: http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/supreme-court-hears-chicago-gun-ban-case/story?id=9780703
Labels:
2nd amendment,
anarchy,
civil rights,
fascism,
freedom,
gun control,
individual freedom,
power of the state,
rebellion,
revolution,
right to bear arms,
second amendment,
totalitarian
Friday, September 18, 2009
Obama Seeks to Continue Federal Wiretapping Under Patriot Act

Even though President Obama voted to reauthorize the Patriot Act as a senator in 2006, he was opposed to provisions in the Patriot Act granting the FBI (and other law enforcement and intelligence agencies) powers for warrantless surveillance. Critics say that such provisions in the Patriot Act have the effect of nullifying certain rights guaranteed to US citizens under the Constitution of the United States (most notably the right to privacy). Now, as President, Obama seeks to continue those provisions which he himself voted against less than four years ago. Obama even goes further by taking the position that the Federal Government is immune to lawsuits stemming from warrantless wiretapping. We need to tell our Democratic leaders that there is not enough of a difference between them and their Republican counterparts. A government spying on its own citizens is the first sign of a fascist state. It is time to drop the draconian Patriot Act and restore the Bill of Rights. Let your government representatives know that you are in favor of restoring freedom and democracy by repealing the Patriot Act: Send them a letter now!
Labels:
CIA,
civil,
fascism,
fascist,
FBI,
federal,
freedom,
government,
obama,
patriot act,
privacy,
right,
rights,
surveillance,
tap,
wire,
wire-tapping,
wiretapping
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
I asked AI if it has been used to influence the U.S. Presidential Election and the answer was disturbing.
Question: Has artificial intelligence been used to influence the U.S. presidential election? ChatGPT: There have been concerns and investig...

-
I could be paddling a rowboat down Market Street in San Francisco after the poles have melted, and there will still be conservative fanatics...
-
Do you recognize this man? Most will say he looks vaguely familiar, and he should...in my opinion, this is the greatest hero of the war in I...